Paleontology dating methods define ralative dating
I always find it interesting how difficult it is for those of an evolutionary standpoint to even question the dogma they are taught.The evolutionary 'Scientific method' seems to screen out any possible variant facts as irrelevant.Of course, the further you go back in history the greater your statistical errors will be... And you can make the result come out to anything you like depending on the assumptions that you make.but combining several dating methods with fossils and evo-devo approach should give one an acceptably accurate idea of when something existed - at least the order of magnitude would be trustworthy (look at the example they gave underneath... Further, comparing results based on one set of assumptions with results based on another set of assumptions does not make the results objective.Which illustrates that, contrary to popular belief, the dating methods are not the primary way that ages are decided. Their results are always ‘interpreted’ to agree with other factors, such as the evolutionary interpretation of geology and fossils.Evolution is supported and endorsed by governments, the media, our major educational institutions and many big businesses.So, for you to ask to identify a non-Christian scientist who has provided evidence for a young earth is a contradiction in terms.
See for example 101 evidences for a young of the earth and the universe.Tests by other scientists using paleomagnetism and fission tracks confirmed the lower date.So by 1980 there was a new, remarkably concordant date for the KBS tuff, and this became the one that was widely accepted.For example, if you do not accept dendrochronology as an accurate method or radio carbon dating which method do you accept and and on what grounds.Also, can you identify a non Christian scientist who has provided scientific evidence for a young earth. Dear Bob, The only reliable way of knowing the age of anything is by the historical method, by eyewitnesses.
Search for paleontology dating methods:
It amazes me that I still hear all the regular mantras I heard in college as an unbeliever, "all real scientists believe in [macro] evolution." Groupthink is alive and well. ) Hi David, It seems that you have missed the point.